Feature Development with AI
Traditional: 20% success rate, $1M payoff, $200K per prototype. Expected value = 0.2 × $1M − $200K = $0 (breakeven).
With AI: Cost drops ~90% to $20K. Same $200K budget = 10 parallel trials. P(≥1) = 1 − 0.8¹⁰ = 89%.
Real Options Theory Meets AI-Enabled R&D
AI slashes prototype costs by 90% and compresses weeks into minutes. When trying is nearly free, the winning move is to try more. This calculator shows exactly how much that's worth.
Try the CalculatorTraditional development forces you to pick one approach early and invest heavily before you know if it's right. By the time you discover it's wrong, you've already spent the budget.
In software, the cost of a wrong architectural decision compounds over time. What starts as a 2-week detour becomes a 6-month rewrite. Teams learn to avoid risk entirely.
When exploration is expensive, organizations become conservative. Moonshot ideas get killed in planning. The unconventional approach never gets tried. Most good ideas die before they're tested.
In finance, an option is the right — but not the obligation — to make a decision later, when you have more information. Real Options Theory, pioneered by economists Stewart Myers, Avinash Dixit, and Robert Pindyck, extends this to business decisions.
When you explore multiple approaches in parallel, you're buying options. You invest a small amount upfront to preserve the ability to choose the best path later — or abandon entirely if none work out.
The key insight: Expanded NPV = Static NPV + Option Value. Even if a project's expected value looks marginal, the flexibility to expand on success or abandon on failure has measurable economic worth.
Probability of At Least One Success
Wait for more information before committing. Valuable when uncertainty is high and the opportunity won't disappear.
Scale up if initial results are promising. A small pilot buys you the right to a larger investment.
Cut losses early. The ability to walk away limits downside and makes bold experiments rational.
Break projects into phases. Each stage is an option to continue or stop based on what you learn.
"The value of information is highest when the cost of gathering it is lowest. AI has made exploration cheap — so explore more."
Model your scenario below. The calculator computes P(≥1) = 1 − (1−p)N to show how parallel attempts shift the probability of success — and the expected value of exploration.
Traditional: 20% success rate, $1M payoff, $200K per prototype. Expected value = 0.2 × $1M − $200K = $0 (breakeven).
With AI: Cost drops ~90% to $20K. Same $200K budget = 10 parallel trials. P(≥1) = 1 − 0.8¹⁰ = 89%.
Setup: 10% chance each concept resonates with customers. $10M market value if one hits.
Traditional (2 concepts @ $100K): P(≥1) = 19%, EV = $1.7M.
AI-enabled (10 concepts @ $20K): P(≥1) = 65%, EV = $6.3M.
Traditionally, "moonshots" with 5% success rates were dismissed — the cost of failure was too high to justify attempting.
With AI, if a prototype costs $250K and the payoff is $50M, the expected value is 0.05 × $50M − $250K = $2.25M. Worth taking.
This framework is grounded in Nobel Prize-winning economics. Real options analysis emerged from Black-Scholes option pricing and has been applied to value flexibility in oil exploration, pharmaceutical R&D, and technology strategy for over 40 years.
We partner with leaders who want to turn real options theory into a working innovation engine. Our process speeds up problem identification and clarification, expands the solution space, and rapidly validates approaches with AI-assisted prototyping. The gains are massive because iteration is now measured in minutes, not weeks.